FindAlternative
Sign in
Back to Focalboard

Focalboard vs Jira

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Focalboard
FocalboardOpen-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion
Visit
Jira
JiraThe #1 software development tool used by agile teams
Visit
Overview
Description

Focalboard is a project management and organization tool that allows users to create boards, lists, and cards to track their work. It's designed to be flexible and customizable, with features like drag-and-drop card movement and customizable workflows. Focalboard is built on top of the Mattermost platform, which means it integrates seamlessly with Mattermost's team messaging and collaboration features.

Jira is a proprietary issue tracking product developed by Atlassian that allows bug tracking and agile project management.

Pricing
Free
Freemium

Free for up to 10 users; paid plans from about $7.75/user/month.

Category
Project Management
Project Management
Best for
Development teams and organizations
Software and enterprise teams
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
26,296
—
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community support, Email support
—
key integrations
Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab
—
primary language
TypeScript
—
platforms
—
Web, iOS, Android
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Highly customizable and flexible
  • Integrates well with Mattermost team messaging and collaboration platform
  • Self-hosted, so you have full control over your data
  • Open-source, so you can customize and extend the platform
  • Powerful and configurable
  • Strong agile support
  • Scales to enterprise
  • Big ecosystem
Cons
  • Can be overwhelming for small teams or simple projects
  • Requires technical expertise to set up and customize
  • Limited mobile app support
  • Can be complex/heavy
  • Configuration overhead
  • Overkill for tiny teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
1
6
User rating
Not enough data
4.5 (4)

What reviewers say

Focalboard Reviews

No reviews yet.

Jira Reviews

4.5 (4)
Anonymous

Solid choice

Tried Jira recently. Big ecosystem. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Recommend Jira

We rolled out Jira last quarter. Strong agile support. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Decent with caveats

We rolled out Jira last quarter. Upside: scales to enterprise. Downside: configuration overhead.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Focalboard

View all →
Trello
Trello

Simple, visual kanban boards for organizing anything.

Compare
OpenProject
OpenProject

Free and open source project management software

Compare
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare
Monday.com
Monday.com

Visual work OS for teams and workflows.

Compare

Alternatives to Jira

View all →
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare
Basecamp
Basecamp

Calm, opinionated project management and team communication.

Compare
Asana
Asana

Work management for teams to plan and track projects.

Compare
Linear
Linear

Fast, opinionated issue tracking built for software teams.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Jira is the safer default for most agile teams needing enterprise‑grade features and a large ecosystem, while Focalboard trades cost for self‑hosting control and open‑source flexibility.

Key differences

  • •Pricing model – Jira offers a free tier then paid per‑user; Focalboard is completely free but self‑hosted.
  • •Deployment – Jira is SaaS cloud; Focalboard requires self‑hosting and technical setup.
  • •Ecosystem – Jira integrates broadly across Atlassian tools; Focalboard’s integrations focus on Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab.
  • •Customization depth – Jira provides highly configurable workflows and advanced roadmaps; Focalboard is open‑source but customization needs code changes.
  • •Support – Jira includes commercial support options; Focalboard relies on community and email support only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Jira’s freemium tier covers up to 10 users and paid plans start at $7.75/user/month; Focalboard is free but adds hosting costs.

Jira

Ease of use / learning curve

Focalboard’s UI is simpler and self‑hosted; Jira can be complex and heavy for new teams.

Focalboard

Features & depth

Jira offers Scrum/Kanban boards, advanced roadmaps, extensive reporting, and deep workflow customization.

Jira

Integrations & ecosystem

Jira benefits from the large Atlassian ecosystem; Focalboard’s key integrations are limited to Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab.

Jira

Collaboration

Jira includes built‑in commenting, mentions, and integrates with many collaboration tools; Focalboard relies on Mattermost for messaging.

Jira

Scalability

Jira scales to enterprise deployments; Focalboard is self‑hosted and may require custom scaling effort.

Jira

Support

Jira offers commercial support options; Focalboard provides only community and email support.

Jira

Security & privacy

Focalboard’s self‑hosted, open‑source nature gives full data control; Jira stores data in the cloud.

Focalboard

Migration / lock‑in

Focalboard’s open source reduces lock‑in risk; Jira’s SaaS model can create migration friction.

Focalboard

Choose Focalboard if…

Teams that prioritize zero software cost, self‑hosting, and open‑source control over extensive features.

Choose Jira if…

Enterprises or agile teams needing robust features, reporting, and official support.

Common questions

Which tool is cheaper for a 20‑user team?

Jira charges about $7.75 per user/month after the free 10‑user tier; Focalboard is free but requires self‑hosting infrastructure costs.

Do both tools support mobile access?

Jira offers iOS and Android apps; Focalboard has limited mobile app support.

Can I integrate the tool with my existing GitHub repos?

Both support GitHub integration; Jira via its broader marketplace, Focalboard via its listed GitHub integration.