Gitea vs GitHub
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Gitea is a lightweight, open‑source Git platform that you can run on your own servers. It provides a clean web UI, issue tracking, pull requests, and CI integration without the overhead of larger solutions. Designed for developers and teams, Gitea runs on Windows, macOS, Linux and via any web browser. It is free to use and supported by an active community and comprehensive documentation.
GitHub is the world's largest platform for hosting Git repositories, combining version control with code review, issue tracking, and CI/CD through GitHub Actions. It is the default home for the vast majority of open-source projects and a standard tool at software companies of every size. Pull requests are the core collaboration unit, providing inline code review, required status checks, and merge queues that keep the main branch stable. GitHub Actions extends this into full CI/CD pipelines defined directly alongside the code in YAML workflows. GitHub Copilot, built into the editor and now the platform itself, brings AI code completion and chat-based assistance directly into the development workflow, while GitHub Advanced Security adds automated vulnerability and secret scanning.
Free for public and private repos; Team plan $4/user/month, Enterprise $21/user/month.
- Free and open‑source
- Lightweight and easy to install
- Cross‑platform support
- Active community and documentation
- Massive ecosystem and community
- Excellent Actions CI/CD integration
- Strong code review tooling
- Copilot AI assistance built in
- Limited advanced enterprise features compared to paid SaaS solutions
- Self‑hosting requires own infrastructure maintenance
- Feature set may lag behind rapidly evolving competitors
- Actions minutes can get expensive at scale
- Advanced Security is a costly add-on
- UI can feel cluttered with many features
What reviewers say
Gitea Reviews
No reviews yet.
GitHub Reviews
4.3 (3)Great tool for development
Been a daily user of GitHub for a while now. Excellent Actions CI/CD integration. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Great tool for development
Been a daily user of GitHub for a while now. Excellent Actions CI/CD integration. One minor gripe: actions minutes can get expensive at scale, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Great tool for development
We've been using GitHub for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong code review tooling. One minor gripe: advanced security is a costly add-on, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Gitea
View all →
Alternatives to GitHub
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataGitHub offers a full‑featured, cloud SaaS platform with strong CI/CD and AI tools at a modest per‑user cost, while Gitea provides a free, self‑hosted, open‑source solution that requires you to manage infrastructure.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: GitHub freemium SaaS vs. Gitea completely free self‑hosted.
- •Hosting: GitHub is cloud‑only; Gitea must be installed on your own servers or containers.
- •Built‑in CI/CD depth: GitHub Actions includes extensive pipeline as code; Gitea’s CI is lightweight and optional.
- •Enterprise features: GitHub offers advanced security scanning and enterprise support; Gitea lacks comparable paid add‑ons.
- •Ecosystem integration: GitHub integrates with Slack, Jira, VS Code, Docker; Gitea’s integrations are limited to Git, GitHub, GitLab via webhooks.
Pricing & value
Gitea is free and open‑source; GitHub charges $4‑$21 per user for paid tiers.
Ease of use / learning curve
GitHub’s polished UI and extensive docs make onboarding quicker than self‑hosting Gitea.
Features & depth
GitHub includes advanced CI/CD, AI pair programming, and security scanning not present in Gitea.
Integrations & ecosystem
GitHub lists key integrations with Slack, Jira, VS Code, Docker; Gitea only lists basic GitHub/GitLab webhooks.
Collaboration
GitHub’s pull‑request UI, project boards, and Copilot AI enhance team collaboration beyond Gitea’s basics.
Scalability
GitHub’s cloud SaaS scales automatically; Gitea’s scalability depends on your own infrastructure capacity.
Support
GitHub offers enterprise support; Gitea provides only community support and documentation.
Choose Gitea if…
Small teams or organizations that require a free, self‑hosted solution and can manage their own servers.
Choose GitHub if…
Enterprises or growing teams needing robust CI/CD, security, and vendor support, willing to pay per user.
Common questions
Can I use GitHub for free on private repositories?
Yes, GitHub’s freemium tier includes unlimited private repos with limited CI minutes.
Do I need to run my own servers for Gitea?
Yes, Gitea is self‑hosted and must be deployed via Docker, binary packages, or source compilation.
Which platform offers built‑in advanced security scanning?
GitHub provides Advanced Security scanning (secret and vulnerability detection) as a paid add‑on; Gitea does not.