Battlefield 2142 vs Star Wars: Battlefront
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Battlefield 2142 thrusts players into a near‑future conflict where the battle for Earth's remaining resources is fought across sprawling, destructible environments. Command massive war machines, pilot advanced aircraft, and engage in intense infantry combat across dynamic maps set in icy wastelands and orbital stations. The game offers both a single‑player campaign and robust multiplayer modes, supporting up to 64 players in large‑scale battles. With its futuristic weapons, vehicles, and class system, Battlefield 2142 delivers a fast‑paced, strategic shooter experience for fans of the series and sci‑fi action alike.
Star Wars: Battlefront lets players experience iconic battles from the original trilogy, from the deserts of Tatooine to the forests of Endor. With massive infantry and vehicle combat, the game captures the scale and excitement of the Star Wars universe. The title features both single‑player missions and robust multiplayer modes, including split‑screen co‑op, allowing friends to fight side‑by‑side across classic locations and vehicles.
- Massive, immersive battles
- Wide variety of futuristic vehicles
- Strong class‑based gameplay
- Robust multiplayer community
- Massive, iconic battlefields
- Variety of vehicles and hero characters
- Split‑screen co‑op for local play
- Faithful recreation of Star Wars locations
- Aging graphics compared to modern titles
- Occasional server stability issues
- Limited single‑player content
- Graphics are dated by modern standards
- Limited online matchmaking features
- AI can be predictable in some scenarios
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Battlefield 2142
View all →
Alternatives to Star Wars: Battlefront
View all →
Experience massive World War II battles in a groundbreaking multiplayer shooter
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth are classic sci‑fi shooters at the same price, but Battlefield 2142 offers larger battles and more vehicle variety, while Star Wars Battlefront adds iconic Star Wars settings and split‑screen co‑op.
Key differences
- •Battlefield 2142 supports up to 64 players per match; Battlefront’s multiplayer scale is lower (no player count given).
- •Battlefield 2142 features hover tanks, jets, orbital fighters; Battlefront focuses on Star Wars vehicles like AT‑ATs and X‑wings.
- •Battlefront includes split‑screen local co‑op; Battlefield 2142 does not mention split‑screen.
- •Battlefield 2142 has a class system (Assault, Engineer, Support); Battlefront does not list classes.
- •Battlefield 2142’s setting is original sci‑fi; Battlefront offers licensed Star Wars locations and hero characters.
Gameplay & fun factor
Battlefield 2142’s 64‑player battles and class system create larger, varied combat experiences.
Platform availability
Battlefront supports PC, Mac, and PlayStation 2 with cross‑platform play; Battlefield 2142 lists only PC and Mac.
Price & value
Both cost $59.99 one‑time, offering comparable value at launch price.
Multiplayer / co‑op
Battlefront adds split‑screen co‑op and broader multiplayer modes; Battlefield 2142 lacks split‑screen.
Content & replayability
Battlefield 2142’s larger player count, vehicle roster, and class progression give higher replay potential.
Difficulty & accessibility
Battlefront’s lower age rating (PEGI 12) suggests easier accessibility than Battlefield 2142 (PEGI 16).
Graphics & performance
Both are noted as having dated graphics by modern standards.
Choose Battlefield 2142 if…
Players who want massive, class‑based sci‑fi battles with many vehicles.
Choose Star Wars: Battlefront if…
Star Wars fans seeking iconic locations, hero units, and local split‑screen co‑op.
Common questions
Do either games offer split‑screen local play?
Only Star Wars: Battlefront supports split‑screen co‑op; Battlefield 2142 does not.
Which game has a larger multiplayer match size?
Battlefield 2142 supports up to 64 players per match; Battlefront’s maximum is not specified but is lower.
Are the graphics modern enough for current PCs?
Both titles are described as having dated graphics compared to modern games.