FindAlternative
Back to Battlefield: Bad Company

Battlefield: Bad Company vs Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Battlefield: Bad Company
Battlefield: Bad CompanyExplosive warfare meets irreverent humor in a chaotic shooter.
Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard
Eat Lead: The Return of Matt HazardA tongue‑in‑cheek shooter that blends action, comedy, and fantasy on classic consoles
Overview
Description

Battlefield: Bad Company delivers a blend of intense first‑person combat and comedic storytelling, set across destructible environments on PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. Players experience a single‑player campaign filled with witty dialogue and a robust multiplayer mode that supports both solo and team play. The game features large‑scale battles, vehicle combat, and a dynamic destruction system that lets you reshape the battlefield in real time. With its shooter, action, and comedy tags, it offers a unique twist on the classic Battlefield formula.

Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard is a parody-filled third‑person shooter starring the titular action hero who finds himself trapped inside a video game. Players blast through absurd levels that mash up fantasy, historical, and sci‑fi settings while delivering over‑the‑top humor. The game offers a single‑player campaign packed with quirky weapons, cartoonish enemies, and a self‑aware storyline that pokes fun at genre tropes, making it a nostalgic yet comedic experience for console gamers.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
First-Person Shooters
Third-Person Shooters
Best for
Fans of tactical shooters
Fans of comedic shooters
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
General
msrp
$59.99
$59.99
release date
2008-06-23
2009-02-26
Specifications
developer
EA Digital Illusions CE
Vicious Cycle Software
publisher
Electronic Arts
D3 Publisher
age rating
ESRB T, PEGI 16
ESRB T
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
Single player
critic score
88/100+91%
46/100
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Highly interactive, destructible environments
  • Entertaining comedic storyline
  • Varied vehicle and class options
  • Strong multiplayer experience
  • Entertaining comedic writing
  • Diverse level themes
  • Creative and wacky weapons
  • Solid third‑person shooting mechanics
Cons
  • Limited to older console hardware
  • Multiplayer servers less active today
  • Occasional performance hiccups during heavy destruction
  • Repetitive enemy designs
  • Camera can be finicky in tight spaces
  • Limited replay value after campaign
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Battlefield: Bad Company

View all →
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Explosive multiplayer warfare with massive destruction and humor.

Compare
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Vietnam
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Vietnam

Experience the gritty Vietnam war in a classic Battlefield shooter

Compare
Battlefield Heroes
Battlefield Heroes

Cartoon‑style, free‑to‑play shooter with fast‑paced team battles

Compare
Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard
Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard

A tongue‑in‑cheek shooter that blends action, comedy, and fantasy on classic consoles

Compare

Alternatives to Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard

View all →
Rogue Warrior
Rogue Warrior

A gritty, over‑the‑top shooter starring a legendary Navy SEAL

Compare
Singularity
Singularity

Manipulate time to unravel a dark sci‑fi mystery.

Compare
Armed and Dangerous
Armed and Dangerous

A wildly comedic shooter where chaos meets fantasy and sci‑fi

Compare
The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay
The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay

A gritty sci‑fi shooter that blends stealth, puzzles, and brutal action in a single‑player masterpiece.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Battlefield: Bad Company offers stronger overall value with superior reviews, multiplayer, and destructible maps, while Eat Lead is a niche single‑player comedy shooter with limited replay.

Key differences

  • Multiplayer: B supports online multiplayer (up to 24) and co‑op; A is single‑player only.
  • Level interaction: B features fully destructible environments; A has static hazards.
  • Gameplay variety: B includes vehicles, classes, and weather effects; A focuses on third‑person shooting with quirky weapons.
  • Critical reception: B scored 88/100 versus A's 46/100.
  • Replayability: B’s multiplayer extends life; A offers limited replay after the campaign.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

B combines destructible maps, vehicles, classes, and co‑op, delivering broader fun than A's single‑player comedic shooting.

Battlefield: Bad Company

Platform availability

Both released for the same generation of consoles (PS3/Xbox 360) and share the same $59.99 price.

Tie

Price & value

B’s higher critic score and multiplayer content give more value for the same $59.99 price.

Battlefield: Bad Company

Multiplayer / co‑op

B offers online multiplayer (24 players) and two‑player co‑op; A is single‑player only.

Battlefield: Bad Company

Content & replayability

B’s multiplayer modes and destructible maps extend replay; A’s replay value is limited after the campaign.

Battlefield: Bad Company

Difficulty & accessibility

A’s single‑player focus and simpler mechanics make it easier for casual players to pick up.

Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard

Graphics & performance

Both support high‑definition graphics on PS3/Xbox 360; no performance data differentiates them.

Tie

Choose Battlefield: Bad Company if…

Players seeking robust multiplayer, vehicle combat, and higher overall quality.

Choose Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard if…

Fans who want a short, comedic single‑player shooter with wacky weapons.

Common questions

Do either of these games have online multiplayer?

Only Battlefield: Bad Company includes online multiplayer (up to 24 players). Eat Lead is single‑player only.

Which game received better critical reviews?

Battlefield: Bad Company has a critic score of 88/100; Eat Lead scored 46/100.

Is there any difference in price?

Both are priced at $59.99 (one‑time purchase).