Duplicati vs Borg
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Duplicati is a free, open-source backup client that securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with standard protocols like FTP, SSH, WebDAV as well as popular services like Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive, box.com, Mega, hubiC and many others.
Borg is a free and open-source deduplicating backup program. It is designed to be highly efficient and secure, with features such as encryption, compression, and data deduplication. Borg is widely used for backing up data on Linux and other Unix-like systems.
- Free and open-source
- Supports a wide range of cloud storage services and remote file servers
- Encrypts backups to ensure data security and confidentiality
- Compresses backups to reduce storage space requirements
- Highly efficient and scalable
- Strong encryption and data integrity features
- Wide range of storage backend support
- Free and open-source
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Limited user interface and user experience
- May require technical expertise for configuration and troubleshooting
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Limited support for Windows and macOS
- Not suitable for real-time backup and recovery
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Duplicati
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth Borg and Duplicati are free, open‑source backup tools; Borg offers stronger deduplication and broader backend flexibility, while Duplicati provides richer cloud service support and a built‑in scheduler.
Key differences
- •Borg uses deduplication algorithm; Duplicati does not mention deduplication.
- •Borg supports SSH/SFTP and generic cloud storage; Duplicati lists specific services (OneDrive, S3, Google Drive, etc.).
- •Borg provides an API; Duplicati does not.
- •Borg is written in Python and runs primarily on Linux; Duplicati is C# and cross‑platform.
- •Borg’s support is limited to email/documentation; Duplicati relies on community support only.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Both note a steep learning curve for beginners; no clear advantage.
Features & depth
Borg includes deduplication, AES‑256‑CBC encryption, checksums, and digital signatures; Duplicati lacks deduplication.
Integrations & ecosystem
Duplicati lists many specific cloud providers (OneDrive, S3, Google Drive, etc.); Borg only mentions generic cloud storage.
Scalability
Borg is described as highly scalable for large, complex environments; Duplicati’s scalability not specified.
Support
Borg offers email support plus documentation; Duplicati provides only community support and documentation.
Security & privacy
Borg specifies AES‑256‑CBC encryption, checksums, and digital signatures; Duplicati mentions encryption but no algorithm detail.
Choose Duplicati if…
Teams requiring out‑of‑the‑box cloud provider support and scheduled backups across OSes.
Choose Borg if…
Linux‑centric admins needing deduplication, strong encryption, and API access.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both Borg and Duplicati are free and open‑source.
Which tool supports more cloud storage providers?
Duplicati lists specific integrations like OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive, Box, Mega, and hubiC.
Do both tools provide an API for automation?
Borg offers an API; Duplicati does not provide an API.