FindAlternative
Back to Empires: Dawn of the Modern World

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World vs Age of Empires III

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Empires: Dawn of the Modern World
Empires: Dawn of the Modern WorldCommand history’s greatest battles in real‑time strategy glory
Age of Empires III
Age of Empires IIIColonial conquest meets real‑time strategy mastery
Overview
Description

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World lets players lead civilizations from the Renaissance to the modern era, blending deep strategic planning with fast‑paced combat. With a robust single‑player campaign and extensive multiplayer modes, the game offers countless scenarios for both solo and cooperative play.

Age of Empires III transports players to the Age of Discovery, letting them command European powers as they explore, settle, and battle across the New World. With detailed graphics, a deep economy system, and historically inspired campaigns, the game blends strategic depth with immersive storytelling.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Real-Time Strategy
Real-Time Strategy
Best for
Strategy enthusiasts and history fans
Strategy enthusiasts and history fans
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
General
msrp
$49.9917%
$59.99
release date
2003-10-21
2005-10-18
Specifications
developer
Stainless Steel Studios
Ensemble Studios
publisher
Activision
Destineer, Microsoft Game Studios, MacSoft Games
age rating
ESRB T
ESRB T, PEGI 12
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative
Single player, Multiplayer
critic score
80/100+3%
78/100
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Deep historical depth across multiple eras
  • Robust multiplayer with co‑op options
  • Strategic resource and tech management
  • High replayability with varied scenarios
  • Deep economic and military systems
  • Rich historical campaigns
  • Strong multiplayer support
  • Extensive modding tools
Cons
  • Graphics are dated by modern standards
  • Steep learning curve for newcomers
  • Limited mod support
  • Steep learning curve for newcomers
  • AI can be predictable in later stages
  • Limited post‑launch content updates
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Empires: Dawn of the Modern World

View all →
Rise of Nations
Rise of Nations

Build an empire from ancient times to the modern age

Compare
Age of Empires III
Age of Empires III

Colonial conquest meets real‑time strategy mastery

Compare
Empire Earth
Empire Earth

Conquer 500,000 years of history in a single real‑time strategy epic

Compare
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings

Lead historic civilizations to victory in timeless real‑time strategy battles.

Compare

Alternatives to Age of Empires III

View all →
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings

Lead historic civilizations to victory in timeless real‑time strategy battles.

Compare
Age of Empires
Age of Empires

Build civilizations and dominate historic battlefields.

Compare
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome

Expand your empire with historic Roman campaigns and deep strategy

Compare
Anno 1602: Creation of a New World
Anno 1602: Creation of a New World

Build colonies and trade across the seas in a historic RTS adventure

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Age of Empires III is the safer default for deep economic colony management and modding, while Empires: Dawn of the Modern World trades this for a slightly higher critic score, broader historical epochs, and co-op multiplayer at a lower price.

Key differences

  • Age of Empires III features a Home City system for requesting shipments and land/naval combat with realistic terrain, whereas Empires spans six epochs and offers co-op campaigns.
  • Age of Empires III includes built-in editors for custom scenarios and maps with extensive modding tools, while Empires has limited mod support.
  • Age of Empires III supports up to 8 players in multiplayer, compared to up to 16 players in Empires.
  • Age of Empires III is priced at $59.99 from Ensemble Studios, while Empires is $49.99 from Stainless Steel Studios.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

Empires has a slightly higher critic score of 80/100 compared to Age of Empires III's 78/100.

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World

Platform availability

Both are PC real-time strategy games released in the mid-2000s (not specified beyond PC genres and general release).

Tie

Price & value

Empires is priced at $49.99, which is $10 cheaper than Age of Empires III's $59.99 MSRP.

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World

Multiplayer / co-op

Empires supports up to 16 players and includes co-op campaigns, whereas Age of Empires III supports up to 8 players without co-op listed.

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World

Content & replayability

Age of Empires III offers built-in editors for custom scenarios/maps and extensive modding tools for endless replayability.

Age of Empires III

Difficulty & accessibility

Both games share a steep learning curve for newcomers as noted in their pros and cons.

Tie

Graphics & performance

Empires' graphics are noted as dated by modern standards, while Age of Empires III has realistic terrain and weather effects.

Tie

Choose Empires: Dawn of the Modern World if…

Budget-conscious players wanting multi-epoch historical spans, co-op campaigns, and support for up to 16 players.

Choose Age of Empires III if…

Players wanting colony management, naval combat, Home City shipments, and robust custom map modding tools.

Common questions

Which game is cheaper?

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World is cheaper with an MSRP of $49.99, compared to Age of Empires III at $59.99.

Which game offers co-op campaigns?

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World features co-operative campaigns requiring coordinated strategies, which is not listed for Age of Empires III.

Which game has better critic scores?

Empires: Dawn of the Modern World holds a critic score of 80/100, while Age of Empires III has a critic score of 78/100.