FindAlternative
Back to Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHigh-performance hybrid processor for laptops
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356HHigh-performance mobile processor with 16 cores
Overview
Description

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a high-performance hybrid processor designed for laptops, featuring a combination of Performance-cores (P-cores) and Efficiency-cores (E-cores) for efficient processing. With its advanced architecture and integrated graphics, this processor delivers fast performance and long battery life.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for demanding applications. With 16 cores, it offers exceptional processing power and efficiency.

Pricing
โ€”
โ€”
Category
Processors (CPUs)
Processors (CPUs)
Best for
Gamers, content creators, and professionals
Gamers, Video Editors, Developers, Business Users
Specifications
Spec source
Verified
AI-estimated
Cache & Power
tdp
28W (base), 115W (max turbo)
28W (up to 64W)
cache
24MB
24MB L3
process node
TSMC N3B (3nm)
TSMC N3B (3nm)
Core & Clock
cores
16 (6P + 8E + 2LP)
โ€”
threads
16
32+100%
base clock
2.0 GHz (P-core)
3.6 GHz+80%
boost clock
5.1 GHz+2%
5.0 GHz
General
socket
FCBGA2049
BGA2833 (mobile), LGA1851 (desktop)
release date
2025-Q1
โ€”
benchmark score
โ€”
Cinebench R23 Multi: 18,500
Graphics & Memory
integrated graphics
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores, up to 2.25 GHz)
Intel Arc 140T
Specifications
TDP
โ€”
15-25 W (max. boost up to 80 W)
Cores
โ€”
16
L3 Cache
โ€”
18MB (shared)
Transistor Size
โ€”
2 nm
npu performance
โ€”
45 TOPS (NPU)
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-performance processing
  • Efficient processing with low power consumption
  • Advanced security features
  • Integrated graphics with AI-enhanced capabilities
  • High-performance processing power
  • Efficient power management
  • Secure architecture
  • Portable design
Cons
  • Limited availability
  • High cost
  • Thermal management challenges
  • Limited software optimization
  • High power consumption
  • Expensive
  • Limited availability
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

High-performance mobile processor with 16 cores

Compare
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

Powerful 8-core processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.

Compare
Apple M4
Apple M4

A revolutionary CPU redefining power and efficiency with a cutting-edge 3nm process.

Compare

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

High-performance hybrid processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.

Compare
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.

Compare
Snapdragon X Elite
Snapdragon X Elite

Powerful, intelligent, and efficient processor for Windows

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (A) delivers top-tier raw performance but consumes more power, while the Ultra 7 255H (B) offers a hybrid design with lower base power and similar graphics, making A the default for maximum compute and B for balanced laptop efficiency.

Key differences

  • โ€ขA provides 32 threads vs B's 16 threads, yielding higher multiโ€‘core performance (Cinebench 18,500).
  • โ€ขAโ€™s base TDP is 15โ€‘25โ€ฏW (boost up to 80โ€ฏW) whereas Bโ€™s base is 28โ€ฏW with a 115โ€ฏW turbo ceiling.
  • โ€ขB uses a hybrid core mix (6P+8E+2LP) targeting efficiency; A uses uniform 16 cores.
  • โ€ขA supports both mobile (BGA2833) and desktop (LGA1851) sockets; B is limited to laptop FCBGA2049.
  • โ€ขBoth have identical Intel Arc 140T graphics, but B lists a 2.25โ€ฏGHz GPU clock versus Aโ€™s unspecified GPU frequency.
DimensionWinner

Performance

A scores 18,500 Cinebench R23 Multi with 32 threads, far exceeding B's hybrid core design.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Power & efficiency

A's base TDP 15โ€‘25โ€ฏW is lower than B's 28โ€ฏW base, despite higher boost capability.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Compatibility

A offers both mobile (BGA2833) and desktop (LGA1851) sockets; B only supports laptop FCBGA2049.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Pricing & value

Pricing not specified for either product.

Tie

Build quality

Build quality details not specified.

Tie

Connectivity

Connectivity features not specified.

Tie

Warranty & support

Warranty information not specified.

Tie

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ifโ€ฆ

Laptopโ€‘focused professionals who prioritize lower base power and hybrid efficiency.

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ifโ€ฆ

Power users needing maximum multiโ€‘core performance and desktopโ€‘compatible options.

Common questions

Which processor is faster for multiโ€‘threaded workloads?

A, with 32 threads and a Cinebench R23 Multi score of 18,500, outperforms B's hybrid 16โ€‘thread design.

How do the power requirements compare?

A operates at 15โ€‘25โ€ฏW base (up to 80โ€ฏW boost); B runs at 28โ€ฏW base with a 115โ€ฏW turbo limit.

Are there differences in graphics performance?

Both use Intel Arc 140T; B specifies a 2.25โ€ฏGHz GPU clock, while A does not list a GPU frequency.