Kopia vs restic
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Kopia is a fast and secure backup and versioning system for files and directories. It provides a simple and efficient way to manage backups and versions of your data. Kopia is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data with ease.
restic is a fast, secure, and efficient backup program that is designed to be easy to use and highly customizable. It supports multiple storage backends, including local directories, SFTP servers, and cloud storage services like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage.
- Fast and efficient backup and versioning
- Secure encryption to protect data
- Highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data
- Cross-platform and open-source
- Fast and efficient backup performance
- Highly customizable to meet specific backup needs
- Supports multiple storage backends and protocols
- Free and open-source software
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Limited user interface options
- May require additional setup and configuration
- Steep learning curve due to complex configuration options
- Limited support for certain storage backends and protocols
- No built-in support for backup scheduling or automation
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Kopia
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth Kopia and restic are free, open‑source, fast, secure backup tools; Kopia offers built‑in versioning and cross‑platform CLI, while restic provides broader storage backend support and de‑duplication.
Key differences
- •Versioning: Kopia includes native file versioning; restic does not.
- •Storage backends: restic supports many backends (SFTP, S3, GCS, etc.); Kopia’s backends are not specified.
- •Data de‑duplication: restic explicitly de‑duplicates; Kopia’s de‑duplication is not mentioned.
- •Compression: restic compresses data; Kopia’s compression is not specified.
Pricing & value
Both are free, open‑source tools offering comparable value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Kopia has a simple CLI but steep learning curve; restic is also steep but adds complex backend config.
Features & depth
restic provides de‑duplication, compression, multiple backup modes, and verification; Kopia focuses on versioning and scalability.
Integrations & ecosystem
restic lists many storage backends (SFTP, S3, GCS); Kopia’s integration list is not specified.
Scalability
Kopia is described as highly scalable and able to handle large data volumes.
Support
Both offer email and GitHub Issues as support channels.
Security & privacy
Both use encryption for data at rest and in transit.
Choose Kopia if…
Developers/IT pros needing built‑in versioning and cross‑platform CLI.
Choose restic if…
Sysadmins/DevOps needing multi‑backend storage, de‑duplication, and compression.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both Kopia and restic are free and open‑source.
Which tool supports more storage destinations?
restic supports multiple backends (local, SFTP, S3, GCS); Kopia’s supported backends are not listed.
Do both tools encrypt my backups?
Yes, both use encryption to protect data at rest and in transit.