FindAlternative
Back to Onedev

Onedev vs semaphore

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Onedev
OnedevAll‑in‑one self‑hosted Git, CI/CD and DevOps platform
semaphore
semaphoreAccelerate DevOps workflows with a cloud‑native CI/CD platform
Overview
Description

OneDev is a self‑hosted solution that combines Git repository management, continuous integration, code review, and issue tracking in a single web interface. It is designed for development teams and DevOps engineers who want full control over their development workflow without relying on external services. The platform integrates tightly with Docker and Kubernetes, enabling automated builds, deployments, and environment provisioning. Being free and open source, OneDev can be deployed on‑premises and customized via its extensible plugin system, while support is provided through documentation and email.

Semaphore provides a fast, cloud‑based continuous integration and delivery service designed for DevOps teams. Its intuitive UI and powerful API let engineers automate builds, tests, and deployments across any infrastructure. With native support for Terraform, Ansible, and PowerShell, Semaphore streamlines infrastructure as code pipelines while delivering real‑time feedback and detailed logs.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
DevOps & CI/CD
DevOps & CI/CD
Best for
Development teams and DevOps engineers
DevOps teams and engineers
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
15,112+9%
13,913
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Documentation
Email
key integrations
Git, Docker, Kubernetes
Ansible, Terraform, PowerShell
primary language
Java
Go
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • All‑in‑one platform reduces tool sprawl
  • Self‑hosted gives full data control
  • Tight integration with Docker and Kubernetes
  • Free tier with generous build minutes
  • Native integrations with Terraform, Ansible, and PowerShell
  • Scalable cloud infrastructure removes maintenance overhead
  • Intuitive UI plus full API for automation
Cons
  • Limited third‑party plugin ecosystem compared to larger platforms
  • User interface can feel dense for new users
  • Enterprise‑level support requires external contracts
  • Limited on‑premise deployment options
  • Advanced reporting features require higher‑tier plans
  • Custom runner support is not available in the free tier
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Onedev

View all →
semaphore
semaphore

Accelerate DevOps workflows with a cloud‑native CI/CD platform

Compare
GitLab
GitLab

The most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform

Compare
Gitea
Gitea

A painless self‑hosted Git service for teams

Compare
GitHub
GitHub

Git hosting, code review, and CI/CD for software teams.

Compare

Alternatives to semaphore

View all →
Jenkins
Jenkins

Open-source automation server for continuous integration and delivery

Compare
GitLab
GitLab

The most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform

Compare
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps

Integrated DevOps platform for planning, building, testing, and delivering software

Compare
Onedev
Onedev

All‑in‑one self‑hosted Git, CI/CD and DevOps platform

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Onedev offers a free, self‑hosted all‑in‑one Git/CI/CD platform with tight Docker/Kubernetes integration, while Semaphore provides a free cloud CI/CD service with native Terraform, Ansible, and PowerShell support; the default safer choice is Onedev if you need on‑prem data control, otherwise Semaphore wins for cloud convenience.

Key differences

  • Deployment model: Onedev is self‑hosted; Semaphore runs only in the cloud.
  • Infrastructure-as‑code support: Semaphore includes native Terraform and Ansible steps; Onedev does not.
  • Built‑in version control: Onedev includes a Git server and issue tracker; Semaphore focuses solely on CI/CD.
  • Container orchestration: Onedev integrates directly with Kubernetes for deployments; Semaphore does not list Kubernetes integration.
  • Plugin/ecosystem: Onedev has limited third‑party plugins; Semaphore offers a visual editor and extensive cloud‑native integrations.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both products offer free tiers; value depends on whether you need self‑hosted infrastructure or cloud scalability.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Semaphore provides a visual pipeline editor and intuitive UI, whereas Onedev’s UI can feel dense for new users.

semaphore

Features & depth

Onedev combines Git server, issue tracking, code review, CI, Docker/Kubernetes deployment in one platform.

Onedev

Integrations & ecosystem

Semaphore includes native Terraform, Ansible, PowerShell, and a REST API; Onedev’s integrations are limited to Git, Docker, Kubernetes.

semaphore

Collaboration

Onedev offers built‑in code review, pull‑request comments, and issue tracking linked to commits and builds.

Onedev

Scalability

Semaphore runs builds on a scalable cloud fleet, eliminating self‑hosted agent management.

semaphore

Support

Onedev lists email and documentation; Semaphore lists only email, making Onedev slightly broader.

Onedev

Choose Onedev if…

Teams needing full data control, on‑prem Git hosting, and integrated issue tracking.

Choose semaphore if…

Teams preferring cloud CI/CD with Terraform/Ansible automation and minimal infrastructure maintenance.

Common questions

Can I run builds on my own servers with Semaphore?

Custom runner support is not available in the free tier; Semaphore is cloud‑only.

Does Onedev support Terraform or Ansible pipelines?

Not specified; Onedev’s key features focus on Docker/Kubernetes, not Terraform or Ansible.

What support options are available for each product?

Onedev offers email and documentation; Semaphore offers email only.