passbolt_api vs gopass
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Passbolt is an open source password manager designed for teams. It allows users to securely store and share sensitive information such as passwords, API keys, and other credentials. Passbolt is built on top of a robust and scalable architecture, making it suitable for large organizations and enterprises.
gopass is a password manager designed for teams and individuals who need to securely store and share sensitive information. It provides a secure and scalable solution for managing passwords, API keys, and other secrets.
- Highly secure and scalable architecture
- Fine-grained access control and permission management
- Secure sharing and collaboration features
- Self-hosted option for full control over data and infrastructure
- Secure and scalable solution for password and secrets management
- Easy to use and integrate with other tools and services
- Supports multiple storage backends and platforms
- Open-source and community-driven
- Steep learning curve for some users
- Limited mobile app functionality
- Some users may find the interface cluttered or overwhelming
- Limited user interface options
- Steep learning curve for advanced features
- Limited support for certain storage backends
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to passbolt_api
View all →
Alternatives to gopass
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataPassbolt offers a richer UI and fine‑grained access controls for team collaboration, while gopass provides a lightweight, CLI‑centric solution; choose Passbolt unless you need a simple, scriptable tool.
Key differences
- •Passbolt includes a web UI for password management; gopass is primarily CLI‑only.
- •Passbolt integrates with LDAP/Active Directory; gopass integrates with Git platforms (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket).
- •Passbolt supports self‑hosting with PHP stack; gopass is a Go binary that runs on multiple OSes without a server component.
- •Passbolt offers two‑factor authentication (TOTP, U2F); gopass does not list specific 2FA methods.
- •Passbolt has 6,022 GitHub stars vs gopass 7,045, indicating slightly higher community interest for gopass.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
gopass uses a CLI which many developers find straightforward; Passbolt’s UI can feel cluttered.
Features & depth
Passbolt provides UI, fine‑grained permissions, MFA, and expiration controls not listed for gopass.
Integrations & ecosystem
Both have strong integrations: Passbolt with LDAP/AD, gopass with Git services; each excels in different domains.
Collaboration
Passbolt’s web interface and permission system are built for team sharing; gopass relies on manual sharing.
Scalability
Passbolt’s self‑hosted architecture and LDAP/AD support suit large organizations; gopass is scalable but less enterprise‑focused.
Support
Passbolt offers email and community forum; gopass offers email and GitHub Issues, but Passbolt’s forum is broader.
Security & privacy
Passbolt includes MFA (TOTP, U2F) and end‑to‑end encryption; gopass mentions encryption but no MFA.
Choose passbolt_api if…
Enterprises or teams needing a web UI, granular permissions, and LDAP/AD integration.
Choose gopass if…
Developers or DevOps groups preferring CLI‑driven, scriptable secret management across platforms.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both Passbolt and gopass are free and open source.
Can I host Passbolt myself?
Yes, Passbolt can be self‑hosted, giving full control over data and infrastructure.
Does gopass provide a graphical user interface?
No, gopass is primarily a command‑line tool; it does not include a web UI.