FindAlternative
Back to Redis

Redis vs MongoDB

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Redis
RedisIn-memory data store for caching and real-time apps.
MongoDB
MongoDBThe popular document (NoSQL) database.
Overview
Description

Redis is an in-memory key-value data store used for caching, session storage, queues, and real-time features, prized for its speed. It supports rich data structures beyond simple key-value.

MongoDB is a document-oriented NoSQL database that stores data as flexible JSON-like documents, popular for its schema flexibility and developer ergonomics. MongoDB Atlas offers a fully managed cloud service.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing

Open source; Redis Cloud managed plans available.

Contact for Pricing

Free community edition and Atlas free tier; paid Atlas scales up.

Category
Databases
Databases
Best for
Backend developers
Developers building flexible apps
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux
Windows, Mac, Linux, Web
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Extremely fast
  • Versatile data structures
  • Great for caching
  • Widely supported
  • Flexible schema
  • Good developer experience
  • Managed Atlas option
  • Scales horizontally
Cons
  • In-memory means RAM cost
  • Persistence needs configuration
  • Not a primary relational store
  • Not ideal for heavily relational data
  • Costs grow with Atlas usage
  • Consistency trade-offs to understand
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
7
5
User rating
4.7 (3)
4.0 (3)

What reviewers say

Redis Reviews

4.7 (3)
Anonymous

Great database

Redis has been part of our stack. Widely supported. Minor gripe: persistence needs configuration. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Solid choice

Been using Redis for a while. Versatile data structures. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Recommend Redis

Been using Redis for a while. Widely supported. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Read all reviews โ†’

MongoDB Reviews

4.0 (3)
Anonymous

Solid choice

Been using MongoDB for a while. Flexible schema. Minor gripe: consistency trade-offs to understand. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Great database

Been using MongoDB for a while. Good developer experience. Minor gripe: not ideal for heavily relational data. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Solid choice

MongoDB has been part of our stack. Good developer experience. Minor gripe: costs grow with atlas usage. Would recommend.

Read all reviews โ†’

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Redis

View all โ†’
MongoDB
MongoDB

The popular document (NoSQL) database.

Compare
ClickHouse
ClickHouse

Column-store database management system

Compare
redis
redis

In-memory data store for real-time web applications

Compare
etcd
etcd

Distributed key-value store for shared configuration and service discovery

Compare

Alternatives to MongoDB

View all โ†’
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

The advanced open-source relational database.

Compare
Redis
Redis

In-memory data store for caching and real-time apps.

Compare
Firebase
Firebase

Googleโ€™s app development platform with realtime backend.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Redis is the safer default for ultraโ€‘fast caching and realโ€‘time workloads, while MongoDB excels when you need flexible document storage and horizontal scaling.

Key differences

  • โ€ขData model: Redis uses inโ€‘memory key/value with rich structures; MongoDB stores persistent JSONโ€‘like documents.
  • โ€ขPersistence: Redis requires explicit configuration for durability; MongoDB persists data by default.
  • โ€ขScaling model: Redis scales vertically (more RAM) and via clustering; MongoDB scales horizontally via sharding and managed Atlas.
  • โ€ขTypical use: Redis is optimized for caching, pub/sub, and session storage; MongoDB is built for flexible schema applications.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

MongoDB offers a free community edition and free Atlas tier; Redis pricing is contactโ€‘based and may be higher for managed cloud.

MongoDB

Ease of use / learning curve

Redis has a simple key/value API and limited commands; MongoDBโ€™s document model and aggregation can be more complex.

Redis

Features & depth

Both provide APIs and core features for their domains; Redis excels at subโ€‘ms ops, MongoDB at rich queries.

Tie

Integrations & ecosystem

MongoDBโ€™s Atlas SaaS, drivers for many languages, and web platform give broader integration options than Redis.

MongoDB

Scalability

MongoDB supports horizontal sharding and managed scaling; Redis primarily scales by adding RAM or using clustering.

MongoDB

Support

Both are open source with commercial options; specific support levels not detailed in facts.

Tie

Security & privacy

Both are open source and can be secured; no specific security features listed in the provided facts.

Tie

Choose Redis ifโ€ฆ

Backend teams needing subโ€‘millisecond caching, pub/sub, or session storage with full control over deployment.

Choose MongoDB ifโ€ฆ

Developers building flexible, schemaโ€‘less apps that require persistent storage and horizontal scaling.

Common questions

Which tool is cheaper to start with?

MongoDB offers a free community edition and free Atlas tier; Redis requires contacting sales for pricing.

Can Redis be used as a primary database?

Redis is primarily an inโ€‘memory cache; persistence is optional and not its main purpose.

Do both products support managed cloud services?

MongoDB has Atlas managed cloud; Redis offers managed Redis Cloud plans, but primary deployment is selfโ€‘hosted.