FindAlternative
Back to Redis

Redis vs MySQL

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Redis
RedisIn-memory data store for caching and real-time apps.
MySQL
MySQLThe world’s most popular open-source relational database.
Overview
Description

Redis is an in-memory key-value data store used for caching, session storage, queues, and real-time features, prized for its speed. It supports rich data structures beyond simple key-value.

MySQL is a widely used open-source relational database that powers a huge portion of the web, known for speed, reliability, and broad hosting support. It remains a default for many web applications and CMSes.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing

Open source; Redis Cloud managed plans available.

Contact for Pricing

Free community edition; paid enterprise editions available.

Category
Databases
Databases
Best for
Backend developers
Web developers
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux
Windows, Mac, Linux
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Extremely fast
  • Versatile data structures
  • Great for caching
  • Widely supported
  • Extremely widely supported
  • Fast for reads
  • Huge community
  • Free community edition
Cons
  • In-memory means RAM cost
  • Persistence needs configuration
  • Not a primary relational store
  • Fewer advanced features than Postgres
  • Licensing nuances (Oracle-owned)
  • Some prefer MariaDB fork
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
7
5
User rating
4.7 (3)
4.5 (4)

What reviewers say

Redis Reviews

4.7 (3)
Anonymous

Great database

Redis has been part of our stack. Widely supported. Minor gripe: persistence needs configuration. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Solid choice

Been using Redis for a while. Versatile data structures. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Recommend Redis

Been using Redis for a while. Widely supported. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Read all reviews →

MySQL Reviews

4.5 (4)
Anonymous

Great database

Tried MySQL recently. Extremely widely supported. Minor gripe: fewer advanced features than postgres. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Great database

Been using MySQL for a while. Huge community. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Anonymous

Solid choice

Been using MySQL for a while. Fast for reads. Minor gripe: some prefer mariadb fork. Would recommend.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Redis

View all →
MongoDB
MongoDB

The popular document (NoSQL) database.

Compare
ClickHouse
ClickHouse

Column-store database management system

Compare
redis
redis

In-memory data store for real-time web applications

Compare
etcd
etcd

Distributed key-value store for shared configuration and service discovery

Compare

Alternatives to MySQL

View all →
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

The advanced open-source relational database.

Compare
Supabase
Supabase

Postgres database for the modern web

Compare
TiDB
TiDB

A cloud‑native, MySQL‑compatible distributed SQL database for massive scalability

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

MySQL is the safer default for traditional relational workloads, while Redis trades durability for sub‑millisecond in‑memory speed.

Key differences

  • Data model: MySQL is a relational SQL database; Redis is a NoSQL in‑memory key‑value store with rich structures.
  • Persistence: MySQL always persists to disk; Redis requires optional configuration and is primarily RAM‑based.
  • Primary use case: MySQL excels at structured queries and ACID transactions; Redis excels at caching, real‑time messaging, and session storage.
  • Performance profile: MySQL offers fast reads but higher latency than Redis’s sub‑millisecond in‑memory ops.
  • Feature depth: MySQL provides replication, clustering, and mature SQL tooling; Redis provides pub/sub, streams, and advanced data structures.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both offer free open‑source editions; paid enterprise options require contacting vendor, so cost advantage is unclear.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

MySQL uses standard SQL, familiar to most developers; Redis requires learning its command set and data‑structure semantics.

MySQL

Features & depth

MySQL provides full relational features, ACID compliance, and mature replication; Redis focuses on caching and limited persistence.

MySQL

Integrations & ecosystem

MySQL’s large ecosystem, tooling, and ubiquitous hosting support outpace Redis’s more niche cache‑oriented integrations.

MySQL

Scalability

Redis’s in‑memory architecture and clustering enable extremely high throughput and low latency at scale.

Redis

Support

Both are open source with enterprise options; neither has specified support details in the facts.

Tie

Security & privacy

No specific security features are listed for either product; both are open source and self‑hosted.

Tie

Choose Redis if…

Backend developers needing ultra‑fast caching, real‑time messaging, or session storage.

Choose MySQL if…

Web developers needing reliable relational storage, complex queries, or ACID transactions.

Common questions

Which tool is better for persisting critical business data?

MySQL, because it always writes to disk and provides full ACID guarantees, whereas Redis is in‑memory and requires optional persistence.

Can I use Redis as a primary database?

Not recommended; Redis is designed for caching and real‑time use cases, not as a primary relational store.

Do both products have free community versions?

Yes, both MySQL and Redis offer free open‑source editions; enterprise plans require contacting the vendor.