FindAlternative
Back to Tales of Xillia

Tales of Xillia vs Tales of Graces

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Tales of Xillia
Tales of XilliaA sweeping JRPG adventure of parallel worlds and destiny
Tales of Graces
Tales of GracesA vibrant JRPG adventure blending real‑time combat with heartfelt storytelling
Overview
Description

Tales of Xillia follows the intertwined fates of Jude, a spirited swordsman, and Ludger, a mysterious girl, as they battle the mysterious Sharlayan Empire and uncover the truth behind the two parallel worlds. With a vibrant cast, real‑time Linear Motion Battle System, and deep narrative choices, the game offers a classic yet fresh role‑playing experience on PlayStation 3.

Tales of Graces follows the journey of protagonist Asbel Lhant as he uncovers ancient mysteries and battles formidable foes across a richly detailed fantasy world. The game combines fast‑paced, action‑oriented combat with deep character development, offering both solo and cooperative experiences. Originally released for PlayStation 3 in 2009, the title showcases stunning anime‑style visuals, a memorable soundtrack, and a blend of linear narrative and optional side content. Players can team up with friends for co‑op missions or tackle the story alone, making it a versatile entry in the long‑running Tales series.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Action RPG
Action RPG
Best for
JRPG enthusiasts
JRPG enthusiasts
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
General
msrp
$59.99
$59.99
release date
2011-09-08
2009-12-10
Specifications
developer
Namco Tales Studio
Namco Tales Studio
publisher
Bandai Namco Entertainment
Bandai Namco Entertainment
age rating
PEGI 16, ESRB T
ESRB T
multiplayer
Single player, Co-operative
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative
critic score
76/100+17%
65/100
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Engaging dual‑protagonist story
  • Responsive real‑time combat system
  • Deep skill customization
  • Beautiful anime‑style visuals
  • Engaging real‑time combat system
  • Rich anime‑style visuals
  • Strong character development and relationships
  • Co‑op mode adds replay value
Cons
  • Linear progression can feel restrictive
  • Voice acting quality varies by character
  • Some side quests are repetitive
  • Linear main storyline limits exploration
  • Voice acting quality varies across characters
  • Some side quests feel repetitive
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Tales of Xillia

View all →
Tales of Xillia 2
Tales of Xillia 2

A thrilling sequel where choices shape destiny in a vibrant fantasy world

Compare
Tales of Vesperia
Tales of Vesperia

Epic action RPG with vibrant worlds and dynamic combat

Compare
Tales of Symphonia
Tales of Symphonia

A vibrant action‑RPG adventure that blends real‑time combat with a heartfelt story

Compare
Tales of Graces
Tales of Graces

A vibrant JRPG adventure blending real‑time combat with heartfelt storytelling

Compare

Alternatives to Tales of Graces

View all →
Tales of Xillia 2
Tales of Xillia 2

A thrilling sequel where choices shape destiny in a vibrant fantasy world

Compare
Tales of Xillia
Tales of Xillia

A sweeping JRPG adventure of parallel worlds and destiny

Compare
Tales of Vesperia
Tales of Vesperia

Epic action RPG with vibrant worlds and dynamic combat

Compare
Tales of Symphonia
Tales of Symphonia

A vibrant action‑RPG adventure that blends real‑time combat with a heartfelt story

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Tales of Xillia is the safer default choice due to its higher critic score (76/100 vs 65/100) and dual-protagonist system, whereas Tales of Graces offers specific environmental features like dynamic weather and day-night cycles not noted in Xillia.

Key differences

  • Tales of Xillia features two main protagonists you can switch between, whereas Tales of Graces features character-specific skill trees without a dual protagonist system.
  • Tales of Xillia includes dynamic weather and day-night cycles that influence enemy behavior, a feature not mentioned in Tales of Graces.
  • Tales of Graces highlights over 100 side quests and optional dungeons, while Tales of Xillia features an extensive side-quest roster for lore and collectibles without a specific count.
  • Critical reception favors Tales of Xillia with a score of 76/100 compared to Tales of Graces' score of 65/100.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

Tales of Xillia wins with a higher critic score of 76/100 (vs. 65) and dual protagonists with unique storylines.

Tales of Xillia

Platform availability

Not specified for either game in the provided facts.

Tie

Price & value

Both games share an identical MSRP of $59.99 as a one-time paid purchase.

Tie

Multiplayer / co-op

Both games support up to two players locally for co-operative battles.

Tie

Content & replayability

Tales of Graces specifically features over 100 side quests and optional dungeons, plus branching storylines and unique skill trees.

Tales of Graces

Difficulty & accessibility

Tales of Graces explicitly includes multiple difficulty settings for newcomers and veterans, which is not specified for Xillia.

Tales of Graces

Graphics & performance

Both games feature high-definition anime art direction with expressive character models and vibrant or detailed environments.

Tie

Choose Tales of Xillia if…

Choose Tales of Xillia if you prefer higher critic scores and switching between two main protagonists.

Choose Tales of Graces if…

Choose Tales of Graces if you want multiple difficulty settings and a specific count of 100+ side quests.

Common questions

How do the prices compare between the two games?

Both Tales of Graces and Tales of Xillia have the same MSRP of $59.99 as a one-time paid purchase.

Can I play either game with a friend in co-op?

Yes, both games support local co-operative play for up to two players to share in battles.

Which game scored better with critics?

Tales of Xillia scored higher with a critic score of 76/100, while Tales of Graces received a critic score of 65/100.