FindAlternative
Back to AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DUnlock Unparalleled Performance
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HA high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.
Overview
Description

Experience the power of AMD's Ryzen 7 9800X3D, a cutting-edge processor designed to deliver exceptional performance and efficiency. With its advanced 4nm and 6nm FinFET process nodes, this CPU is perfect for gamers, content creators, and professionals who demand the best.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a revolutionary CPU built on the advanced TSMC N3B process node, combining 16 cores and 16 threads with a 5.4 GHz boost clock. Engineered for elite mobile systems, it delivers exceptional efficiency and computing power for intensive workloads. Equipped with powerful Intel Arc 140T integrated graphics and advanced architecture, this processor excels at high-end gaming, complex content creation, and professional productivity applications without requiring a discrete GPU for basic visual tasks.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Category
Processors (CPUs)
Processors (CPUs)
Best for
Gamers, Enthusiasts, Content Creators
Gamers and content creators
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
Verified
Cache & Power
tdp
120W
45W (base), 115W (max turbo)โˆ’63%
cache
96 MB (640 KB L1 + 8 MB L2 + 96 MB L3)+300%
24MB
process node
TSMC 4nm FinFET (CPU Cores), TSMC 6nm FinFET (I/O Die)
TSMC N3B (3nm)
Core & Clock
cores
8
16 (6P + 8E + 2LP)+100%
threads
16
16
base clock
4.7 GHz+62%
2.9 GHz (P-core)
boost clock
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz+4%
General
socket
AM5
FCBGA2049
release date
2024-11-07
2025-Q1
benchmark score
โ€”
โ€”
Graphics & Memory
integrated graphics
AMD Radeon Graphics (2 cores, 2200 MHz)
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores, up to 2.35 GHz)+6900%
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Exceptional performance and efficiency
  • Advanced 4nm and 6nm FinFET process nodes
  • High-performance integrated graphics
  • Supports latest PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 technologies
  • Exceptional multi-core and single-core performance for mobile devices
  • Powerful integrated Intel Arc graphics capability
  • Advanced 3nm TSMC N3B process node for improved efficiency
  • Dedicated NPU support for modern AI tasks
Cons
  • High power consumption with 120W TDP
  • May require expensive AM5 motherboard
  • Limited overclocking capabilities
  • High maximum turbo power draw of 115W requires robust cooling
  • Limited to laptop and mobile form factors via FCBGA2049 socket
  • Premium pricing tier positioning for high-end systems
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

View all โ†’
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Unleash Extreme Performance

Compare
Intel Core i9 processor 14900K
Intel Core i9 processor 14900K

Unleash Extreme Performance

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.

Compare

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

High-performance mobile processor with 16 cores

Compare
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

High-performance hybrid processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H

High-performance processor for desktop applications

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is built for high-performance desktop systems with massive L3 cache, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is designed specifically for mobile and laptop form factors.

Key differences

  • โ€ขForm factor and socket: AMD uses the desktop AM5 socket, while Intel is restricted to mobile/laptop form factors via the FCBGA2049 socket.
  • โ€ขCache capacity: AMD offers 96 MB of cache compared to Intel's 24MB.
  • โ€ขCore configuration: AMD features 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel uses a 16-core hybrid architecture (6P, 8E, 2LP) with 16 threads.
  • โ€ขBase and boost clocks: AMD runs at a 4.7 GHz base and 5.2 GHz boost, whereas Intel runs at a 2.9 GHz P-core base and 5.4 GHz max turbo boost.
  • โ€ขIntegrated graphics: AMD includes 2-core Radeon Graphics, while Intel features Intel Arc 140T with 8 Xe-cores.
DimensionWinner

Performance

Both offer exceptional performance for gamers and creators, with AMD utilizing 96 MB cache and Intel reaching a 5.4 GHz boost.

Tie

Build quality

Not specified.

Tie

Connectivity

AMD natively supports PCIe 5.0 for faster storage and graphics performance.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Power & efficiency

Intel operates at a lower 45W base TDP (scaling to 115W max), whereas AMD operates at a flat 120W TDP.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Compatibility

AMD fits the AM5 desktop socket, while Intel is limited to mobile laptops via the FCBGA2049 socket.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Price & value

AMD pricing requires contact, and Intel is positioned in a premium pricing tier for high-end systems.

Tie

Warranty & support

Not specified.

Tie

Choose AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ifโ€ฆ

Gamers and desktop enthusiasts seeking high-end desktop performance and PCIe 5.0 support.

Choose Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ifโ€ฆ

Users looking for a high-performance mobile processor designed for laptops.

Common questions

Can I use the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H in a custom desktop build?

No, it is limited to laptop and mobile form factors via the FCBGA2049 socket.

Which processor has a larger cache?

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D has 96 MB of cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has 24MB.

What are the power requirements for each processor?

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a 120W TDP, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a 45W base TDP and 115W max turbo TDP.