FindAlternative
Back to Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HA high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHigh-performance hybrid processor for laptops
Overview
Description

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a revolutionary CPU built on the advanced TSMC N3B process node, combining 16 cores and 16 threads with a 5.4 GHz boost clock. Engineered for elite mobile systems, it delivers exceptional efficiency and computing power for intensive workloads. Equipped with powerful Intel Arc 140T integrated graphics and advanced architecture, this processor excels at high-end gaming, complex content creation, and professional productivity applications without requiring a discrete GPU for basic visual tasks.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a high-performance hybrid processor designed for laptops, featuring a combination of Performance-cores (P-cores) and Efficiency-cores (E-cores) for efficient processing. With its advanced architecture and integrated graphics, this processor delivers fast performance and long battery life.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
โ€”
Category
Processors (CPUs)
Processors (CPUs)
Best for
Gamers and content creators
Gamers, content creators, and professionals
Specifications
Spec source
Verified
Verified
Cache & Power
tdp
45W (base), 115W (max turbo)
28W (base), 115W (max turbo)โˆ’38%
cache
24MB
24MB
process node
TSMC N3B (3nm)
TSMC N3B (3nm)
Core & Clock
cores
16 (6P + 8E + 2LP)
16 (6P + 8E + 2LP)
threads
16
16
base clock
2.9 GHz (P-core)+45%
2.0 GHz (P-core)
boost clock
5.4 GHz+6%
5.1 GHz
General
socket
FCBGA2049
FCBGA2049
release date
2025-Q1
2025-Q1
benchmark score
โ€”
โ€”
Graphics & Memory
integrated graphics
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores, up to 2.35 GHz)
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores, up to 2.25 GHz)
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Exceptional multi-core and single-core performance for mobile devices
  • Powerful integrated Intel Arc graphics capability
  • Advanced 3nm TSMC N3B process node for improved efficiency
  • Dedicated NPU support for modern AI tasks
  • High-performance processing
  • Efficient processing with low power consumption
  • Advanced security features
  • Integrated graphics with AI-enhanced capabilities
Cons
  • High maximum turbo power draw of 115W requires robust cooling
  • Limited to laptop and mobile form factors via FCBGA2049 socket
  • Premium pricing tier positioning for high-end systems
  • Limited availability
  • High cost
  • Thermal management challenges
  • Limited software optimization
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

High-performance mobile processor with 16 cores

Compare
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

High-performance hybrid processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H

High-performance processor for desktop applications

Compare

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

High-performance mobile processor with 16 cores

Compare
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

Powerful 8-core processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.

Compare
Apple M4
Apple M4

A revolutionary CPU redefining power and efficiency with a cutting-edge 3nm process.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is the safer, higher-performing default for demanding workloads due to its higher base clock and boost speed, while the Core Ultra 7 255H trades performance for a lower base power draw. The main trade-off is higher base power and performance in the Ultra 9 versus lower base power in the Ultra 7.

Key differences

  • โ€ขBase Clock Speed: The Core Ultra 7 255H has a base clock of 2.0 GHz (P-core), while the Core Ultra 9 285H operates at a faster 2.9 GHz base clock (P-core).
  • โ€ขBoost Clock Speed: The Core Ultra 7 255H reaches up to 5.1 GHz, whereas the Core Ultra 9 285H achieves a higher 5.4 GHz max turbo boost.
  • โ€ขBase TDP: The Core Ultra 7 255H uses 28W base TDP for efficient processing, while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses 45W base TDP for sustained performance.
  • โ€ขIntegrated Graphics Speed: The Core Ultra 7 255H supports up to 2.25 GHz Intel Arc 140T graphics, compared to up to 2.35 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H.
DimensionWinner

Performance

The Core Ultra 9 285H wins with a higher 2.9 GHz base clock, 5.4 GHz boost clock, and up to 2.35 GHz graphics.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Build quality

Both are manufactured on the advanced TSMC N3B 3nm process node and share the FCBGA2049 socket form factor.

Tie

Connectivity

Connectivity details are not specified for either processor in the provided facts.

Tie

Power & efficiency

The Core Ultra 7 255H features a lower 28W base TDP for efficient processing compared to the 45W base TDP of the Ultra 9.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Compatibility

Both processors share the exact same FCBGA2049 socket and mobile laptop form factor limitations.

Tie

Price & value

Pricing is unknown for the Core Ultra 7 255H, while the Core Ultra 9 285H is in a premium pricing tier.

Tie

Warranty & support

Warranty and support details are not specified for either processor in the provided facts.

Tie

Choose Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ifโ€ฆ

Choose the Ultra 9 285H if you need maximum clock speeds and a 45W base TDP.

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ifโ€ฆ

Choose the Ultra 7 255H if you want efficient processing with a lower 28W base TDP.

Common questions

How do their clock speeds compare?

The Core Ultra 7 255H has a 2.0 GHz base clock and 5.1 GHz boost clock, whereas the Ultra 9 285H has a 2.9 GHz base clock and 5.4 GHz boost clock.

What is the difference in power consumption?

The Core Ultra 7 255H operates at a 28W base TDP, while the Core Ultra 9 285H operates at a 45W base TDP. Both scale up to a 115W max turbo TDP.

How do their integrated graphics differ?

Both use Intel Arc 140T graphics with 8 Xe-cores, but the Ultra 7 255H supports speeds up to 2.25 GHz while the Ultra 9 285H supports up to 2.35 GHz.