FindAlternative
Back to Empire Earth III

Empire Earth III vs Age of Empires III

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Empire Earth III
Empire Earth IIICommand global factions through five historical epochs in real-time strategy combat.
Age of Empires III
Age of Empires IIIColonial conquest meets real‑time strategy mastery
Overview
Description

Empire Earth III is a real-time strategy video game developed by Mad Doc Software and published by Sierra Entertainment. Released on November 6, 2007, the game is the final installment in the Empire Earth series and spans world history across five distinct epochs. Players can choose from three unique factions—Western, Middle Eastern, and Far Eastern—each featuring specialized buildings, units, and technologies. The game offers both single-player and multiplayer modes, challenging users to conquer rivals and expand their dominance across the globe.

Age of Empires III transports players to the Age of Discovery, letting them command European powers as they explore, settle, and battle across the New World. With detailed graphics, a deep economy system, and historically inspired campaigns, the game blends strategic depth with immersive storytelling.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Real-Time Strategy
Real-Time Strategy
Best for
Real-time strategy enthusiasts
Strategy enthusiasts and history fans
Specifications
Specifications
developer
Mad Doc Software
Ensemble Studios
publisher
Sierra Entertainment
Destineer, Microsoft Game Studios, MacSoft Games
age rating
ESRB T
ESRB T, PEGI 12
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
critic score
40/100
78/100+95%
General
release date
2007-11-06
2005-10-18
msrp
$59.99
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Features three distinct playable factions with unique units and technologies
  • Spans five historical epochs of human civilization
  • Includes both single-player and multiplayer gameplay modes
  • Offers a global conquest campaign structure on a world map
  • Deep economic and military systems
  • Rich historical campaigns
  • Strong multiplayer support
  • Extensive modding tools
Cons
  • Received generally unfavorable reviews from critics upon release
  • Contains fewer epochs than previous titles in the franchise
  • Simplifies some mechanics compared to earlier entries in the series
  • Steep learning curve for newcomers
  • AI can be predictable in later stages
  • Limited post‑launch content updates
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Empire Earth III

View all →
Empire Earth
Empire Earth

Conquer 500,000 years of history in a single real‑time strategy epic

Compare
Empire Earth II
Empire Earth II

Lead civilizations through 15 epochs of human history in this epic real-time strategy game.

Compare
Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest
Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest

Expand your historical empire across time from Ancient Rome to 24th Century Mars.

Compare
Age of Empires III
Age of Empires III

Colonial conquest meets real‑time strategy mastery

Compare

Alternatives to Age of Empires III

View all →
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings
Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings

Lead historic civilizations to victory in timeless real‑time strategy battles.

Compare
Age of Empires
Age of Empires

Build civilizations and dominate historic battlefields.

Compare
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome

Expand your empire with historic Roman campaigns and deep strategy

Compare
Anno 1602: Creation of a New World
Anno 1602: Creation of a New World

Build colonies and trade across the seas in a historic RTS adventure

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Age of Empires III offers deeper historical campaigns and richer multiplayer, while Empire Earth III provides broader epoch coverage but poorer critical reception.

Key differences

  • Historical depth: AoE III focuses on colonial-era Europe with detailed campaigns; EE III spans five epochs across world history.
  • Multiplayer robustness: AoE III supports up to 8 players with customizable settings; EE III’s multiplayer is less detailed (no player count given).
  • Critical reception: AoE III scored 78/100, EE III only 40/100, indicating overall quality differences.
  • Faction variety: EE III offers three distinct factions; AoE III uses a single Home City system with varied units but no separate factions.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

AoE III provides deep economic, military, and weather-influenced combat systems versus EE III’s simpler mechanics.

Age of Empires III

Platform availability

Both are paid PC titles; no platform differences specified.

Tie

Price & value

AoE III MSRP $59.99; EE III price not listed, making AoE III’s known cost the reference point.

Age of Empires III

Multiplayer / co-op

AoE III supports up to eight players with custom settings; EE III’s multiplayer details are minimal.

Age of Empires III

Content & replayability

AoE III includes a map editor, extensive mod tools, and robust AI; EE III offers fewer epochs and less content.

Age of Empires III

Difficulty & accessibility

EE III is noted as simpler, making it easier for newcomers; AoE III has a steep learning curve.

Empire Earth III

Graphics & performance

No graphics or performance data provided for either game.

Tie

Choose Empire Earth III if…

Players seeking a simpler, broader‑epoch RTS and are less concerned with critical reviews.

Choose Age of Empires III if…

Strategy fans who value historical depth, strong multiplayer, and modding tools.

Common questions

Which game has better multiplayer support?

Age of Empires III supports up to eight players with customizable settings; Empire Earth III’s multiplayer details are not specified.

Is one game easier for beginners?

Empire Earth III is described as having simpler mechanics, making it more accessible than Age of Empires III’s steep learning curve.

How do the critical scores compare?

Age of Empires III received a 78/100 critic score, while Empire Earth III received 40/100.