FindAlternative
Back to Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H

Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356HHigh-performance processor for desktop applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356HHigh-performance mobile processor with 16 cores
Overview
Description

The Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H is a high-performance processor with 16 cores, 18M cache, and up to 4.70 GHz frequency.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for demanding applications. With 16 cores, it offers exceptional processing power and efficiency.

Pricing

Contact for Pricing

โ€”
Category
Processors (CPUs)
Processors (CPUs)
Best for
Developers, gamers, content creators, and video editors.
Gamers, Video Editors, Developers, Business Users
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
Cache & Power
tdp
25 W (base), 80 W (max turbo), 15 W (min assured)โˆ’11%
28W (up to 64W)
cache
18 MB Intel Smart Cache
24MB L3+33%
process node
Intel 18A
TSMC N3B (3nm)
Core & Clock
cores
16 (4P + 8E + 4LP)
โ€”
threads
16
32+100%
base clock
1.9 GHz (Performance-core), 1.5 GHz (Efficient-core), 1.5 GHz (Low Power Efficient-core)
3.6 GHz+89%
boost clock
4.7 GHz (Performance-core), 3.5 GHz (Efficient-core), 3.3 GHz (Low Power Efficient-core)
5.0 GHz+6%
General
socket
FCBGA2540
BGA2833 (mobile), LGA1851 (desktop)
release date
2026-01-01
โ€”
benchmark score
โ€”
Cinebench R23 Multi: 18,500
Specifications
npu performance
50 TOPS (NPU)+11%
45 TOPS (NPU)
TDP
โ€”
15-25 W (max. boost up to 80 W)
Cores
โ€”
16
L3 Cache
โ€”
18MB (shared)
Transistor Size
โ€”
2 nm
Graphics & Memory
integrated graphics
Intel Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-performance processing
  • High cache memory
  • High frequency
  • Supports multiple threads
  • High-performance processing power
  • Efficient power management
  • Secure architecture
  • Portable design
Cons
  • High power consumption
  • Requires advanced cooling systems
  • May require additional hardware support
  • High power consumption
  • Expensive
  • Limited availability
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

High-performance mobile processor with 16 cores

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

High-performance hybrid processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core i9 processor 14900K
Intel Core i9 processor 14900K

Unleash Extreme Performance

Compare

Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

View all โ†’
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

High-performance hybrid processor for laptops

Compare
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.

Compare
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.

Compare
Snapdragon X Elite
Snapdragon X Elite

Powerful, intelligent, and efficient processor for Windows

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Product B offers higher core count, boost speed, and broader platform support, while Product A is a desktopโ€‘focused chip with strong cache but higher power needs.

Key differences

  • โ€ขCore/Thread count: B has 16 coresโ€ฏ/โ€ฏ32 threads vs Aโ€™s 16 coresโ€ฏ/โ€ฏ16 threads.
  • โ€ขBoost frequency: B reaches 5.0โ€ฏGHz, A tops out at 4.7โ€ฏGHz on performance cores.
  • โ€ขCache size: B provides 24โ€ฏMB L3 cache (18โ€ฏMB shared) compared with Aโ€™s 18โ€ฏMB Intel Smart Cache.
  • โ€ขProcess technology: B uses TSMC N3B 3โ€ฏnm (2โ€ฏnm transistor size) while A is built on Intel 18A node.
  • โ€ขPlatform versatility: B supports both mobile BGA2833 and desktop LGA1851 sockets; A is limited to desktop FCBGA2540.
DimensionWinner

Performance

B delivers higher boost (5.0โ€ฏGHz), more threads (32) and larger cache, yielding higher Cinebench score.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Power & Efficiency

Bโ€™s base TDP range (15โ€‘25โ€ฏW) is lower than Aโ€™s 25โ€ฏW base, despite similar max turbo power.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Compatibility

B supports both mobile and desktop sockets, offering broader device integration than Aโ€™s single desktop socket.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Pricing & Value

Both have undisclosed pricing; no factual basis to declare a price advantage.

Tie

Build Quality

No specific information on build quality or warranty for either product.

Tie

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H ifโ€ฆ

Desktopโ€‘only builders who need Intel Smart Cache and can accommodate higher power/thermal design.

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ifโ€ฆ

Users needing maximum cores/threads, higher boost, and flexibility across mobile and desktop platforms.

Common questions

Which processor offers better multiโ€‘threaded performance?

Product B, with 32 threads and higher boost clock, outperforms Product Aโ€™s 16 threads.

Can either chip be used in a laptop?

Product B supports a mobile BGA2833 socket; Product A is limited to a desktop FCBGA2540 socket.

Is there a clear price advantage for either model?

Pricing is not specified for either product, so no price advantage can be determined.