Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H is a high-performance processor with 16 cores, 18M cache, and up to 4.70 GHz frequency.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a high-performance hybrid processor designed for laptops, featuring a combination of Performance-cores (P-cores) and Efficiency-cores (E-cores) for efficient processing. With its advanced architecture and integrated graphics, this processor delivers fast performance and long battery life.
Contact for Pricing
- High-performance processing
- High cache memory
- High frequency
- Supports multiple threads
- High-performance processing
- Efficient processing with low power consumption
- Advanced security features
- Integrated graphics with AI-enhanced capabilities
- High power consumption
- Requires advanced cooling systems
- May require additional hardware support
- Limited availability
- High cost
- Thermal management challenges
- Limited software optimization
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H
View all →A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.
Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
View all →
A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataProduct B offers higher boost clocks and newer 3nm efficiency, while Product A provides larger cache and lower base power; choose B for peak speed, A for balanced desktop workloads.
Key differences
- •Boost clock: B reaches 5.1 GHz vs A’s 4.7 GHz (P‑cores).
- •Process node: B uses 3 nm TSMC N3B, A uses Intel 18A (larger).
- •Cache: A has 18 MB vs B’s 24 MB (larger cache may benefit data‑intensive apps).
- •TDP range: A 25 W‑80 W, B 28 W‑115 W (B can draw more power for performance).
- •Integrated graphics: A uses Intel Graphics (unspecified), B has Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe‑cores, 2.25 GHz).
Performance
Higher boost clock (5.1 GHz) and 3 nm node give B superior single‑thread and peak performance.
Build quality
Both use BGA sockets (FCBGA2540 vs FCBGA2049) and similar core counts; no clear advantage.
Connectivity
No connectivity details provided for either; cannot differentiate.
Power & efficiency
A’s lower base TDP (25 W) and lower max turbo (80 W) consume less power than B’s 115 W peak.
Compatibility
A targets desktop platforms (FCBGA2540), likely broader motherboard options than B’s laptop‑only socket.
Price & value
Pricing not specified for either; value cannot be assessed.
Warranty & support
No warranty or support information provided for either product.
Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 356H if…
Desktop developers or creators needing stable power and larger cache, with existing cooling solutions.
Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 255H if…
Laptop gamers or content creators prioritizing peak speed and AI‑enhanced graphics, willing to manage higher heat.
Common questions
Which processor delivers higher single‑core performance?
Product B, with a 5.1 GHz boost clock versus Product A’s 4.7 GHz.
Will the higher TDP of Product B require special cooling?
Yes, B can reach 115 W turbo, which typically needs advanced laptop cooling solutions.
Is the integrated graphics performance better on Product B?
Product B includes Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe‑cores, up to 2.25 GHz), which is specified, while Product A’s graphics are unspecified.