Kanboard vs Focalboard
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Kanboard is an open‑source project management tool that visualizes work using simple Kanban boards. It runs on any web server and requires no subscription, making it ideal for budget‑conscious teams. Designed for small teams and solo users, Kanboard offers drag‑and‑drop task management, customizable columns, and built‑in analytics without the overhead of large enterprise platforms.
Focalboard is a project management and organization tool that allows users to create boards, lists, and cards to track their work. It's designed to be flexible and customizable, with features like drag-and-drop card movement and customizable workflows. Focalboard is built on top of the Mattermost platform, which means it integrates seamlessly with Mattermost's team messaging and collaboration features.
- Completely free and open source
- Self‑hosted gives full data control
- Simple, lightweight interface
- Extensible via plugins
- Highly customizable and flexible
- Integrates well with Mattermost team messaging and collaboration platform
- Self-hosted, so you have full control over your data
- Open-source, so you can customize and extend the platform
- No native third‑party integrations
- Limited advanced reporting compared to paid tools
- Requires own server setup and maintenance
- Can be overwhelming for small teams or simple projects
- Requires technical expertise to set up and customize
- Limited mobile app support
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Kanboard
View all →
Alternatives to Focalboard
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth tools are free and self‑hosted, but Focalboard offers richer integrations and collaboration features at the cost of higher setup complexity, while Kanboard provides a simpler, lightweight experience for small teams.
Key differences
- •Focalboard integrates with Mattermost, GitHub, and GitLab; Kanboard has no native third‑party integrations.
- •Focalboard includes built‑in collaboration (mentions, commenting); Kanboard lacks these social features.
- •Kanboard offers built‑in analytics (cumulative flow, lead‑time charts); Focalboard does not list analytics.
- •Focalboard is written in TypeScript and targets development teams; Kanboard is PHP‑based and aimed at small teams/individuals.
- •Kanboard’s UI is lightweight and easier for newcomers; Focalboard can feel overwhelming for simple projects.
Pricing & value
Both are free and self‑hosted, offering full data control without licensing costs.
Ease of use / learning curve
Kanboard’s simple, lightweight interface is easier for small teams; Focalboard can be overwhelming and needs technical setup.
Features & depth
Focalboard provides customizable workflows, board hierarchy, and collaboration tools; Kanboard focuses on core Kanban with limited extras.
Integrations & ecosystem
Focalboard ships with Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab integrations; Kanboard has no native integrations, only optional plugins.
Collaboration
Focalboard includes @mentions, commenting, and tight Mattermost integration; Kanboard lacks built‑in collaborative communication features.
Support
Focalboard offers community and email support; Kanboard provides email and documentation only, no community channel listed.
Choose Kanboard if…
Small teams or individuals wanting a straightforward, lightweight Kanban board without integrations.
Choose Focalboard if…
Development teams needing deep integrations, advanced collaboration, and customizable workflows, willing to handle setup complexity.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both Focalboard and Kanboard are free and open source; no licensing fees.
Can I integrate the board with my existing GitHub repositories?
Focalboard supports native GitHub integration; Kanboard has no built‑in third‑party integrations.
Which tool is easier to set up for a non‑technical user?
Kanboard’s simple UI and minimal setup make it easier for non‑technical users; Focalboard requires more technical expertise.