ActivityWatch vs Kimai
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
ActivityWatch is an open-source time tracking and productivity tool that helps you stay focused and on track. It automatically tracks how you spend your time on your computer or mobile device, providing you with detailed statistics and insights to optimize your workflow.
Kimai is a free, open-source time tracking software that helps individuals and teams track their work hours and stay organized. It offers a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy to log time spent on tasks and projects.
- Automated time tracking saves time and effort
- Detailed statistics and insights help optimize workflow
- Customizable rules and filters ensure accurate time tracking
- Focus mode helps users stay concentrated and avoid distractions
- Free and open-source
- Simple and intuitive interface
- Customizable dashboard and widgets
- Support for multiple users and teams
- Steep learning curve for advanced features
- Limited integration with certain productivity tools
- Mobile app can be buggy at times
- Limited features compared to paid time tracking software
- Steep learning curve for advanced features
- Limited support options
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to ActivityWatch
View all →
Open‑source task manager that blends time tracking, kanban and agile planning for freelancers and small teams.
Alternatives to Kimai
View all →
Open‑source task manager that blends time tracking, kanban and agile planning for freelancers and small teams.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth ActivityWatch and Kimai are free, open‑source time‑trackers; ActivityWatch excels at automated, granular tracking, while Kimai offers stronger project‑management and multi‑user features.
Key differences
- •Automation: ActivityWatch auto‑captures app/website usage; Kimai relies on manual start/stop entries.
- •Project & invoicing: Kimai includes built‑in project, tag, report, and invoice generation; ActivityWatch lacks these.
- •User collaboration: Kimai supports multiple users/teams out of the box; ActivityWatch is single‑user focused.
- •Focus mode: ActivityWatch provides a dedicated distraction‑blocking mode; Kimai does not.
- •Technology stack: ActivityWatch is Python‑based; Kimai is PHP‑based, which may affect hosting preferences.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Kimai’s simple manual entry UI is easier for beginners; ActivityWatch’s advanced automation has a steeper curve.
Features & depth
ActivityWatch provides automated tracking, focus mode, and customizable rules not found in Kimai.
Integrations & ecosystem
Neither lists specific third‑party integrations; both expose APIs.
Collaboration
Kimai explicitly supports multiple users and teams; ActivityWatch is primarily single‑user.
Scalability
Kimai’s multi‑user design scales to teams, whereas ActivityWatch is geared toward individual freelancers.
Support
ActivityWatch offers GitHub Issues plus email; Kimai only lists email and documentation.
Choose ActivityWatch if…
Freelancers who want hands‑free, detailed time capture and focus tools.
Choose Kimai if…
Teams or freelancers needing project organization, invoicing, and multi‑user tracking.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both ActivityWatch and Kimai are free, open‑source products with no licensing fees.
Can I track time automatically without clicking start/stop?
Yes, ActivityWatch auto‑captures app and website usage; Kimai requires manual entry.
Which tool supports multiple users and invoicing?
Kimai includes built‑in multi‑user support, project management, and invoice generation; ActivityWatch does not.